練習問題
語彙・文法 / 読解 / 英作文 / リスニングの4分野で実力を確認しましょう。解答解説付き。
The government has pledged to ( ) emissions by 50% over the next decade to combat climate change.
- alleviate
- curtail
- perpetuate
- circumvent
正解
2. curtail(削減する、制限する)
解説:curtail は「削減する・制限する」という意味の動詞。emissions(排出量)を削減するという文脈に最適です。
alleviate(和らげる)、perpetuate(永続させる)、circumvent(回避する)はいずれも文脈に合いません。
( ) working together, can we hope to solve this global challenge effectively.
- Although
- Only by
- Never
- Despite
正解
2. Only by(〜することによってのみ)
解説:「Only by + 動名詞」で「〜することによってのみ」という強調の倒置構文です。Only by working together, can we ... という倒置になります。
この問題の文は「力を合わせることによってのみ、この世界的な課題を効果的に解決できる」という意味になります。
The new policy runs ( ) our organization's commitment to sustainability.
- counter to
- in lieu of
- conducive to
- in the wake of
正解
1. counter to(〜に反する)
解説:run counter to は「〜に反する、〜と矛盾する」という熟語。「新しい政策は私たちの組織の持続可能性への取り組みに反する」という意味になります。
in lieu of(〜の代わりに)、be conducive to(〜に有益な)、in the wake of(〜の後を受けて)はいずれも文脈に合いません。
( ) hard the exam may be, she is determined to pass it.
- Whatever
- Whoever
- However
- Wherever
正解
3. However(どれほど〜でも)
解説:「However + 形容詞/副詞 + S + V」で「どれほど〜でも」という意味の複合関係副詞。「試験がどれほど難しくても、彼女は合格する決意だ」という意味になります。
It was ( ) that the project ultimately failed to secure approval.
- for lacking of funding
- because of the lack of funding
- the funding was lacking
- from the lack of funding
正解
2. because of the lack of funding(強調構文で理由を強調)
解説:強調構文「It was ~ that ...」で理由・原因を強調する場合、because of +名詞句 の形を that の前に置きます。「It was because of the lack of funding that the project ultimately failed to secure approval(プロジェクトが最終的に承認を得られなかったのは資金不足が原因だった)」。裸の名詞句 "the lack of funding" では強調構文の要素として抽出できないため不可。
The scientist's findings ( ) the widely accepted theory that the disease was caused solely by genetic factors.
- reinforced
- refuted
- endorsed
- elaborated
正解
2. refuted(反論した、否定した)
解説:refute は「(論拠をもって)反論する・否定する」という意味。「科学者の発見が、病気は遺伝的要因のみで引き起こされるという広く認められた理論を否定した」という文脈に合います。
reinforce(強化する)、endorse(支持する)、elaborate(詳述する)はいずれも文意に合いません。
The merger was ( ) until both companies' shareholders gave their approval.
- suspended
- designated
- proliferated
- scrutinized
正解
1. suspended(一時停止された)
解説:suspend は「一時的に停止する・中断する」という意味。「合併は両社の株主が承認するまで一時停止された」という文脈に合います。
designate(指定する)、proliferate(急増する)、scrutinize(精査する)は文意に合いません。
Not until the results were published ( ) realize the full extent of the environmental damage.
- the public did
- did the public
- the public was able to
- had the public been able to
正解
2. did the public(倒置形)
解説:「Not until ~」が文頭に来ると、後続の主節は倒置(助動詞+主語)になります。「Not until the results were published did the public realize...(結果が公表されて初めて、市民は環境被害の全容を認識した)」
The committee decided to ( ) the project due to insufficient funding and lack of public interest.
- abandon
- amplify
- reconcile
- invoke
正解
1. abandon(断念する、放棄する)
解説:abandon は「捨てる・放棄する」という意味。「資金不足と市民の関心の低さから、委員会はプロジェクトを断念することにした」という文脈に合います。
amplify(拡大する)、reconcile(和解させる)、invoke(発動する)は文意に合いません。
( ) great the difficulty, the team was determined to find a solution before the deadline.
- Despite how
- However
- No matter what
- Even though
正解
2. However(どれほど〜でも)
解説:「However + 形容詞 + S + V」で「どれほど〜でも」という意味の複合関係副詞の構文です。「However great the difficulty(困難がどれほど大きくても)」となります。
Despite how は後に節が続かず、No matter what は名詞・代名詞、Even though は節をとるため、いずれも文法的に不適切です。
The committee's decision to ( ) the budget allocations was widely criticized as shortsighted.
- implement
- scrutinize
- slash
- endorse
正解
3. slash(大幅に削減する)
解説:slash は「大幅に削減する」という意味の動詞。「予算配分を大幅に削減するという委員会の決定は近視眼的と批判された」という文脈に合います。implement(実施する)、scrutinize(精査する)、endorse(支持する)は文意に合いません。
The policy was criticized for ( ) the economic burden disproportionately on low-income households.
- deflecting
- placing
- reconciling
- discarding
正解
2. placing(負わせる)
解説:place a burden on は「〜に負担を課す」という意味の頻出表現。「低所得世帯に経済的負担を不均衡に課している」という文脈に合います。disproportionately(不均衡に)とセットで覚えましょう。
( ) the sun having set two hours earlier, the hikers decided to make camp rather than press on through the dark.
- Despite
- Given
- With
- Although
正解
3. With(付帯状況構文:〜という状況で)
解説:「With + 名詞 + 分詞(現在分詞・過去分詞・形容詞)」で付帯状況を表す構文。"With the sun having set two hours earlier"(日没から2時間経っていたので)→ ハイカーたちはキャンプを張ることにした、という背景状況を示します。Although は接続詞で S+V の節を必要とするため不可。Despite は名詞句をとりますが、後に "having set" のような動詞的要素を伴う付帯状況には with が適切です。
The technology is expected ( ) the way we interact with information within the next decade.
- transforming
- to transform
- to have transformed
- having transformed
正解
2. to transform(不定詞:変革すると予想される)
解説:「be expected to V」は「〜すると予想される / 期待される」という受動態の構文。準1級リーディングで頻出の認識受動態パターンです(be said to / be believed to / be expected to)。"within the next decade"(今後10年以内に)は未来を示すため、to have transformed(完了形)は不適切。
The conference brought together researchers from diverse fields, ( ) the gap between theoretical science and practical application.
- bridging
- bridged
- to bridge
- having bridged
正解
1. bridging(〜しながら)
解説:主節の動作と同時進行の付帯状況を示す現在分詞構文。「会議は多様な分野の研究者を集め、理論科学と実用との間の溝を橋渡ししながら…」という意味になります。bridged(過去分詞)にすると受動の意味になり不自然、to bridge は目的を示す不定詞で文意が変わります。
The negotiators reached an agreement ( ) the original deadline, averting a potential trade dispute.
- ahead of
- in lieu of
- at the expense of
- on the grounds of
正解
1. ahead of(〜より前に)
解説:ahead of the deadline で「期限より前に」という意味。avert(回避する)、trade dispute(貿易紛争)とセットで押さえたい表現です。in lieu of(〜の代わりに)、at the expense of(〜を犠牲にして)、on the grounds of(〜の理由で)はいずれも文意に合いません。
The minister's comments were ( ) as an endorsement of the opposition's policy, which she later denied.
- construed
- invoked
- perpetuated
- mitigated
正解
1. construed(解釈された)
解説:construe A as B は「AをBとして解釈する」という意味の重要動詞。「大臣のコメントは野党の政策の支持と解釈されたが、彼女は後にそれを否定した」。invoke(発動する)、perpetuate(永続させる)、mitigate(緩和する)は文意に合いません。
( ) having submitted the paper early, the researcher was asked to make substantial revisions.
- Despite
- Although
- Because of
- Given
正解
1. Despite(〜にもかかわらず)
解説:Despite は前置詞で、後に名詞句(having submitted the paper early)をとります。「早期に論文を提出したにもかかわらず、研究者は大幅な修正を求められた」。Although は接続詞で節(S+V)が続く必要があるため不可。
Rarely ( ) such a dramatic reversal of public opinion in such a short period of time.
- has there been seen
- there has been seen
- has been seen there
- been seen has there
正解
1. has there been seen(倒置形)
解説:否定語 Rarely が文頭に来ると、主節が倒置(助動詞 + 主語 + 過去分詞)になります。has there been seen は has(助動詞)+ there(主語)+ been seen(受動完了)の倒置形。「これほど短期間でこれほど劇的な世論の逆転は見られたことがほとんどなかった」。
The report's conclusions, ( ) on data collected over ten years, carry significant weight in policy discussions.
- basing
- based
- to base
- having based
正解
2. based(〜に基づいた)
解説:過去分詞の分詞構文(受動的関係)。"based on data" は「データに基づいた」という意味の過去分詞形容詞句で、前の名詞 conclusions を修飾しています。「10年間のデータに基づいた結論は、政策議論に大きな重みを持つ」。
The scientist's hypothesis was ( ) by subsequent experiments conducted at three independent laboratories.
- circumvented
- postulated
- corroborated
- perpetuated
正解
3. corroborated(裏付けられた)
解説:corroborate は「(証拠・実験によって)裏付ける・確証する」という意味。「科学者の仮説は3つの独立した研究室で行われた後続の実験によって裏付けられた」という文脈に合います。postulate(仮定する)は能動的行為なので受動には不自然。
The well-intentioned reform ( ) the very problem it was designed to solve, leading to widespread criticism.
- alleviated
- exacerbated
- mitigated
- reconciled
正解
2. exacerbated(悪化させた)
解説:exacerbate は「(問題・状況を)悪化させる」という意味。「善意の改革が解決しようとした問題そのものを悪化させた」という逆説的な文脈に合います。alleviate / mitigate はともに「緩和する」という意味で逆。
The board's decision ( ) a fundamental shift in the company's approach to environmental responsibility.
- gave rise to
- fell short of
- made inroads into
- came at a cost to
正解
1. gave rise to(〜を引き起こした)
解説:give rise to は「〜を引き起こす・〜をもたらす」という意味。「役員会の決定が環境責任に対する会社のアプローチの根本的な転換をもたらした」。fall short of(〜に達しない)/ make inroads into(〜に進出する)は文脈に合いません。
Economic inequality, ( ) by decades of neglect, has become one of the most politically divisive issues of our time.
- perpetuating
- to perpetuate
- perpetuated
- having perpetuated
正解
3. perpetuated(永続化されてきた)
解説:過去分詞の分詞構文(受動的関係)。Economic inequality が「数十年の怠慢によって」永続化させられてきた、という受動の関係なので過去分詞 perpetuated が正解。perpetuating は能動的意味になり文意が変わります。
The government's new initiative ( ) the existing gap between urban and rural access to healthcare, rather than closing it.
- bridged
- widened
- reconciled
- alleviated
正解
2. widened(広げた)
解説:"rather than closing it"(格差を縮小するどころか)という逆接が決め手。格差が広がったという意味の widened が正解。bridge a gap(格差を埋める)/ reconcile(調和させる)/ alleviate(緩和する)はいずれも格差を縮小する意味で逆です。
The scientific evidence for climate change is ( ), with thousands of peer-reviewed studies pointing to the same conclusion.
- anecdotal
- compelling
- inconclusive
- controversial
正解
2. compelling(説得力のある)
解説:"thousands of peer-reviewed studies pointing to the same conclusion"(同じ結論を指す数千の査読済み研究)という根拠から、compelling(説得力のある、有力な)が正解。anecdotal(個人的な体験談に基づく)は逆の意味。inconclusive(決定的でない)/ controversial(議論の余地がある)も文脈と矛盾します。
The charity's work is funded ( ) through private donations, with no government support.
- ostensibly
- exclusively
- provisionally
- marginally
正解
2. exclusively(もっぱら)
解説:"with no government support"(政府の支援はない)という補足説明から、exclusively(もっぱら、完全に〜のみで)が正解。ostensibly(表向きは)は偽装・見せかけの意味を含む。provisionally(暫定的に)/ marginally(わずかに)は文意に合いません。
The pharmaceutical company's decision to ( ) the patent early was praised as an act of corporate responsibility.
- enforce
- relinquish
- extend
- monetize
正解
2. relinquish(放棄する)
解説:relinquish は「(権利・地位などを)放棄する、手放す」という意味。特許を「早期に放棄した」ことが社会的責任として称えられた文脈に合います。enforce(実施する)/ extend(延長する)/ monetize(収益化する)はいずれも特許を維持・活用する方向の語で逆です。
次の英文を読み、問いに答えなさい。
The concept of a "circular economy" has gained considerable traction as an alternative to the traditional linear model of "take, make, dispose." In a circular economy, resources are kept in use for as long as possible, and waste is minimized by recovering and regenerating materials at the end of their service life. This model stands in stark contrast to our current consumption-driven economy, which has led to significant environmental degradation and resource depletion.
Proponents of the circular economy argue that it offers a viable path toward sustainable development. By designing products for longevity and recyclability, and by encouraging sharing and leasing rather than outright ownership, businesses can reduce their reliance on virgin materials while simultaneously generating new revenue streams. Furthermore, a circular economy has the potential to create new jobs in sectors such as repair, refurbishment, and recycling.
However, transitioning to a circular economy is not without its challenges. Consumer behavior, deeply ingrained habits of convenience and disposability, must fundamentally change. Additionally, businesses require significant upfront investment in new technologies and processes. Critics also argue that without clear regulatory frameworks and government incentives, the circular economy will remain a niche concept rather than a mainstream economic model.
What does the author say about the circular economy model?
- It is identical to the linear model of production.
- It aims to minimize waste by keeping resources in use as long as possible.
- It relies primarily on government subsidies to function.
- It has already replaced traditional economic models in most countries.
正解
2. It aims to minimize waste by keeping resources in use as long as possible.
解説:第1段落に "resources are kept in use for as long as possible, and waste is minimized" と書かれています。これを言い換えたのが選択肢2です。
According to the passage, what is one challenge of transitioning to a circular economy?
- Circular economies create fewer jobs than linear economies.
- Governments are universally opposed to circular economy policies.
- Consumer habits of convenience and disposability need to change fundamentally.
- Companies have no financial incentive to adopt circular models.
正解
3. Consumer habits of convenience and disposability need to change fundamentally.
解説:第3段落に "Consumer behavior, deeply ingrained habits of convenience and disposability, must fundamentally change" とあります。これを言い換えたのが選択肢3です。
次の英文を読み、問いに答えなさい。(第2パッセージ)
Artificial intelligence is increasingly being integrated into healthcare, promising to revolutionize the way diseases are diagnosed and treated. Machine learning algorithms can now analyze medical images with a precision that rivals, and in some cases surpasses, that of experienced radiologists. For instance, AI systems have demonstrated the ability to detect early-stage cancers in mammograms and retinal scans with remarkable accuracy, potentially saving thousands of lives annually through earlier intervention.
Despite these promising developments, the adoption of AI in clinical settings remains cautious. One significant concern is the "black box" problem: many AI systems arrive at conclusions through processes that are opaque even to their developers, making it difficult for medical professionals to understand or explain the reasoning behind a diagnosis. This lack of transparency raises serious ethical and legal questions, particularly in cases where an AI's recommendation conflicts with a physician's clinical judgment.
Furthermore, questions persist about data bias. AI systems are trained on historical datasets that may not adequately represent all demographic groups, potentially leading to less accurate diagnoses for underrepresented populations. Addressing these issues requires not only technical innovation but also robust regulatory frameworks and interdisciplinary collaboration between technology developers, clinicians, ethicists, and policymakers.
According to the passage, what is one advantage of using AI in healthcare?
- It completely replaces the need for human radiologists.
- It can detect certain diseases at an early stage with high accuracy.
- It eliminates all forms of diagnostic error in medical practice.
- It provides transparent explanations for every diagnosis it makes.
正解
2. It can detect certain diseases at an early stage with high accuracy.
解説:第1段落に "AI systems have demonstrated the ability to detect early-stage cancers ... with remarkable accuracy" とあります。これを言い換えた選択肢2が正解です。
What does the author identify as a challenge to the wider adoption of AI in medicine?
- AI systems cost too much for most hospitals to afford.
- AI is unable to process medical images at sufficient speed.
- The decision-making process of many AI systems is not easily understood.
- Most clinicians refuse to work alongside AI technology.
正解
3. The decision-making process of many AI systems is not easily understood.
解説:第2段落の "black box" problem の説明、"many AI systems arrive at conclusions through processes that are opaque even to their developers" が根拠です。選択肢3はこれを言い換えたものです。
次の英文を読み、問いに答えなさい。(第3パッセージ)
The global food system faces a profound paradox: while approximately 800 million people suffer from chronic hunger, an estimated one-third of all food produced for human consumption — roughly 1.3 billion tonnes per year — is lost or wasted. This inefficiency has enormous environmental consequences. Food waste is responsible for approximately 8% of global greenhouse gas emissions, as decomposing organic matter releases methane, a greenhouse gas more potent than carbon dioxide over short time horizons.
Food loss and food waste are distinct but related problems. Food loss occurs primarily at the production and storage stages, often due to inadequate infrastructure, poor harvesting techniques, or lack of refrigeration — challenges that disproportionately affect developing nations. Food waste, by contrast, occurs predominantly at the retail and consumer level in wealthy countries, driven by overly strict cosmetic standards for produce, over-purchasing, and confusion over labeling such as "best before" and "use by" dates.
Addressing food waste requires coordinated action across the entire supply chain. Innovations such as improved cold chain logistics, AI-powered demand forecasting for retailers, and consumer education campaigns have all demonstrated promise. Some countries have adopted legal frameworks to encourage food redistribution: France, for instance, passed legislation in 2016 prohibiting supermarkets from destroying unsold food, instead requiring them to donate it to charities or food banks. While no single intervention will solve the problem, the scale of its environmental and humanitarian costs makes reducing food waste one of the highest-impact actions available to both individuals and policymakers.
According to the passage, what is the main difference between food loss and food waste?
- Food loss is more environmentally harmful than food waste.
- Food loss happens earlier in the supply chain, while food waste occurs at the retail and consumer level.
- Food loss is a problem unique to developing nations, while food waste is a global issue.
- Food loss is caused by consumer behavior, while food waste results from poor farming methods.
正解
2. Food loss happens earlier in the supply chain, while food waste occurs at the retail and consumer level.
解説:第2段落に "Food loss occurs primarily at the production and storage stages" / "Food waste, by contrast, occurs predominantly at the retail and consumer level" と明確に対比されています。選択肢2はこの対比を正確に言い換えたものです。
What does the author suggest about France's 2016 legislation?
- It was primarily designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from landfill.
- It demonstrated that legal frameworks can be used to redirect food from waste to redistribution.
- It has been adopted as a model by most developed nations since its introduction.
- It placed too much responsibility on individual consumers rather than retailers.
正解
2. It demonstrated that legal frameworks can be used to redirect food from waste to redistribution.
解説:第3段落でフランスの法律を "legal frameworks to encourage food redistribution" の例として挙げ、「スーパーが売れ残り食料を破棄することを禁じ、慈善団体・フードバンクへの寄付を義務付けた」と説明しています。選択肢2がこれを正確に言い換えています。
次の英文を読み、問いに答えなさい。(第4パッセージ)
The rise of remote work, dramatically accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, has prompted a fundamental reassessment of where and how professional life is conducted. Before 2020, working from home was a privilege available to a small minority of knowledge workers; today, hybrid arrangements — combining remote and in-office work — have become a permanent feature of many organizational cultures. This shift has profound implications for urban planning, commuter infrastructure, commercial real estate, and, perhaps most significantly, for workers' quality of life.
Proponents of remote and hybrid work cite compelling evidence in its favor. Studies consistently show that employees working from home report higher job satisfaction, reduced commute-related stress, and better work-life balance. For caregivers — a category that disproportionately includes women — the flexibility of remote work can be transformative, enabling career continuity that traditional office arrangements often impede. Companies, for their part, have benefited from reduced real estate costs and access to a geographically unrestricted talent pool.
Critics, however, argue that the costs of remote work have been systematically underestimated. Spontaneous collaboration, mentorship of junior employees, and the informal transmission of institutional knowledge are difficult to replicate in virtual environments. There is also growing evidence that remote work exacerbates existing inequalities: workers in small apartments or shared households face disproportionate difficulty concentrating, while those with dedicated home offices report few such disadvantages. Furthermore, the erosion of clear boundaries between work and personal time — what researchers call "availability creep" — has been linked to increased burnout, particularly among highly committed employees.
According to the passage, what is one benefit of remote work for employees?
- It allows companies to reduce their workforce through automation.
- It eliminates all professional inequalities between male and female workers.
- It enables caregivers to maintain career continuity more effectively.
- It guarantees higher productivity for all types of employees.
正解
3. It enables caregivers to maintain career continuity more effectively.
解説:第2段落に "For caregivers ... the flexibility of remote work can be transformative, enabling career continuity that traditional office arrangements often impede" とあります。
What does "availability creep" refer to in the context of the passage?
- The gradual spread of remote work across more industries
- The increasing reliance on digital communication tools in offices
- The blurring of boundaries between work time and personal time
- The tendency of remote workers to become unavailable during office hours
正解
3. The blurring of boundaries between work time and personal time
解説:"the erosion of clear boundaries between work and personal time — what researchers call 'availability creep'" — ダッシュの後の定義が答えです。
次の英文を読み、問いに答えなさい。(第5パッセージ)
The global decline in biodiversity has emerged as one of the most pressing environmental crises of the twenty-first century. Current rates of species extinction are estimated to be between 100 and 1,000 times higher than natural background rates, leading scientists to speak of a "sixth mass extinction" event. Unlike previous mass extinctions caused by natural phenomena such as asteroid impacts or volcanic activity, the present crisis is driven primarily by human activities: habitat destruction, overexploitation of species, pollution, the spread of invasive species, and increasingly, climate change.
The consequences of biodiversity loss extend far beyond the disappearance of individual species. Ecosystems function through intricate webs of interdependence, in which the removal of even a single species can trigger cascading effects throughout the food chain. The loss of pollinators such as bees and butterflies, for instance, directly threatens the agricultural systems upon which human food security depends. Similarly, the destruction of mangrove forests — which protect coastlines, filter pollutants, and serve as nursery habitat for fish — has economic consequences that extend far beyond the local communities that depend on them.
Conservation efforts have intensified in response to this crisis. International frameworks such as the Convention on Biological Diversity have set targets for protecting a portion of the world's land and oceans. However, critics argue that these targets have frequently been missed and that protected area designations do not always translate into effective on-the-ground conservation. Moreover, the underlying economic incentives that drive deforestation and overexploitation remain largely unaddressed. Some economists advocate for "natural capital" accounting — integrating the economic value of ecosystems into national financial frameworks — as a means of making biodiversity conservation economically rational.
According to the passage, what distinguishes the current mass extinction from previous ones?
- It is occurring at a slower pace than natural extinction events.
- It is primarily driven by human activities rather than natural phenomena.
- It is concentrated in tropical regions and does not affect temperate zones.
- It was first recognized by scientists only in the twenty-first century.
正解
2. It is primarily driven by human activities rather than natural phenomena.
解説:第1段落 "Unlike previous mass extinctions caused by natural phenomena ... the present crisis is driven primarily by human activities" が直接の根拠です。選択肢2はこれを正確に言い換えています。
What argument do some economists make about addressing biodiversity loss?
- International conservation agreements should be replaced by market-based solutions.
- Assigning financial value to ecosystems could make their conservation economically appealing.
- Countries should be penalized financially if they fail to meet extinction reduction targets.
- The cost of protecting biodiversity is too high for developing nations to afford.
正解
2. Assigning financial value to ecosystems could make their conservation economically appealing.
解説:第3段落 "natural capital accounting — integrating the economic value of ecosystems into national financial frameworks — as a means of making biodiversity conservation economically rational" が根拠。選択肢2は "economically rational" を "economically appealing" に言い換えたものです。
TOPIC
Agree or disagree: Artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on employment in the long run.
POINTS:
- Job creation in new industries
- Automation of routine tasks
- Skills development
解答例(138語)
I believe that artificial intelligence will ultimately have a positive effect on employment. There are two compelling reasons for this position.
First, while AI may automate many routine tasks, it simultaneously creates new industries and job categories. The rise of AI has already generated demand for AI engineers, data scientists, and ethics specialists — roles that simply did not exist a decade ago.
Second, AI frees workers from repetitive, low-skill tasks, allowing them to focus on creative and interpersonal work that machines cannot replicate. This shift encourages ongoing skills development and lifelong learning, ultimately making the workforce more adaptable and productive.
In conclusion, provided that adequate retraining programs are in place, AI should create more opportunities than it eliminates in the long term.
語数チェック:138語 ✓(120〜150語の範囲内)
TOPIC
Agree or disagree: Social media does more harm than good to modern society.
POINTS:
- Mental health
- Misinformation
- Global connectivity
解答例(143語)
I am firmly convinced that social media causes more harm than good to contemporary society. My position is supported by two key arguments.
First, there is growing evidence that excessive social media use contributes to deteriorating mental health, particularly among young people. Studies have consistently linked heavy social media consumption with increased rates of anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem.
Second, social media has become a major vehicle for the spread of misinformation. False news can go viral within hours, influencing public opinion and potentially destabilizing democratic processes. The 2020 pandemic demonstrated how quickly dangerous misinformation could proliferate on these platforms.
In conclusion, while social media offers undeniable benefits for global connectivity, its negative impacts on mental health and information integrity far outweigh its advantages.
TOPIC
Agree or disagree: Governments should invest more in renewable energy sources rather than continuing to use fossil fuels.
POINTS:
- Environmental impact
- Economic considerations
- Energy security
解答例(141語)
I strongly believe that governments should prioritize investment in renewable energy over fossil fuels. Two main reasons support this view.
First, the environmental benefits are undeniable. Burning fossil fuels releases enormous quantities of greenhouse gases, directly contributing to climate change. Renewable sources such as solar and wind power generate electricity with minimal carbon emissions, helping to protect ecosystems and mitigate the effects of global warming.
Second, investing in renewables enhances long-term energy security. Unlike fossil fuels, which are finite and subject to volatile international prices, renewable energy relies on inexhaustible natural resources. Countries that develop their own renewable capacity reduce dependence on foreign energy imports, thereby strengthening their economic and political stability.
In conclusion, the environmental and strategic advantages of renewable energy make it a far wiser investment than continued reliance on fossil fuels.
語数チェック:141語 ✓(120〜150語の範囲内)
TOPIC
Agree or disagree: Universities should place greater emphasis on practical skills rather than theoretical knowledge.
POINTS:
- Employability
- Critical thinking
- Adaptability
解答例(137語)
I disagree with the view that universities should prioritize practical skills over theoretical knowledge. I have two reasons for this position.
First, theoretical knowledge fosters critical thinking and intellectual adaptability. Students who understand the underlying principles of their field can tackle novel problems that no vocational training could anticipate. In an era of rapid technological change, this capacity to learn and adapt is arguably more valuable than any specific set of practical skills.
Second, many practical skills quickly become obsolete. Software tools and industry procedures evolve constantly, making today's competencies tomorrow's redundancies. By contrast, a strong theoretical foundation enables graduates to acquire new practical skills as the need arises.
In conclusion, universities should continue to emphasize theoretical learning while incorporating practical elements, rather than abandoning academic rigor entirely.
語数チェック:137語 ✓(120〜150語の範囲内)
TOPIC
Agree or disagree: Governments should introduce a carbon tax to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
POINTS:
- Environmental effectiveness
- Economic impact
- Social equity
解答例(139語)
I agree that governments should introduce a carbon tax to combat climate change. Two strong reasons support this position.
First, a carbon tax is one of the most effective tools for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. By making fossil fuel consumption more expensive, it creates financial incentives for businesses and consumers to shift toward cleaner alternatives. Several countries, including Sweden, have demonstrated that a well-designed carbon tax can significantly reduce emissions without harming economic growth.
Second, the revenue generated can be redistributed to offset the regressive impact on lower-income households. By returning carbon tax revenue as a dividend to all citizens equally, governments can ensure that the environmental policy is both effective and socially equitable.
In conclusion, a properly designed carbon tax represents a practical and fair mechanism for achieving meaningful emissions reductions.
語数チェック:139語 ✓(120〜150語の範囲内)
TOPIC
Agree or disagree: Technology has made modern life better overall.
POINTS:
- Communication
- Health and well-being
- Privacy
解答例(144語)
I agree that technology has, on balance, improved modern life. Two reasons lead me to this conclusion.
First, technology has dramatically improved global communication. The internet and smartphones allow people to maintain relationships across vast distances, access information instantly, and coordinate collaborative efforts in ways previously unimaginable. These capabilities have enriched both personal relationships and professional productivity.
Second, medical technology has extended and improved quality of life. Advances in diagnostics, surgical techniques, and pharmaceutical treatments have reduced mortality rates and enabled people to manage chronic conditions that would once have been fatal or severely debilitating.
While legitimate concerns about privacy and digital addiction deserve attention, these are challenges to be managed rather than reasons to reject technological progress altogether. The net benefits of technology — in communication, healthcare, and beyond — far outweigh its drawbacks.
語数チェック:144語 ✓(120〜150語の範囲内)
リスニング練習の使い方
「音声を再生」ボタンでスクリプトを音声再生できます(Web Speech APIを使用)。選択肢を先に読んでから音声を再生して、本番に近い練習をしてみましょう。
会話を聴いて、質問に答えなさい。
Question: What is the woman's main concern?
- The cost of the new project
- The tight deadline for submission
- The quality of the team members
- The lack of communication from management
Man: How is the merger project going? I heard things have been quite hectic lately.
Woman: To be honest, I'm a bit overwhelmed. We have to submit the final report by Friday, and we still have two major sections to complete.
Man: That does sound stressful. Have you talked to the project manager about extending the deadline?
Woman: I tried, but apparently the board meeting is scheduled for Monday, and the report is needed before that. So there's no flexibility.
Man: I see. Well, maybe we could divide the remaining sections among the team members and work in parallel?
Woman: That might work. I just hope everyone can manage the extra workload on top of their regular responsibilities.
正解
2. The tight deadline for submission
解説:女性は「金曜日までに最終報告書を提出しなければならない」と述べており、締め切りが迫っていることを主な懸念として表明しています。「We have to submit the final report by Friday」が直接の根拠です。
ナレーションを聴いて、質問に答えなさい。
Question: What is one benefit of community gardens mentioned in the passage?
- They significantly reduce city temperatures.
- They allow residents to access fresh produce affordably.
- They replace the need for commercial farming entirely.
- They are primarily intended for professional gardeners.
Narrator: Community gardens have emerged as a popular urban initiative in many cities worldwide. These shared green spaces allow residents to grow their own vegetables and fruits, often at minimal cost. Particularly in low-income neighborhoods, where access to fresh, affordable produce is limited, community gardens can play a crucial role in improving nutritional health.
Narrator: Beyond their nutritional benefits, community gardens serve important social functions. They bring together residents from diverse backgrounds, fostering a sense of community and social cohesion. Research has shown that neighborhoods with active community gardens tend to have lower crime rates and higher levels of civic engagement.
Narrator: However, maintaining community gardens requires sustained commitment from volunteers and ongoing funding support. Without adequate resources, these green spaces can quickly fall into disrepair, undermining their potential benefits.
正解
2. They allow residents to access fresh produce affordably.
解説:第1段落に "allow residents to grow their own vegetables and fruits, often at minimal cost" とあります。「minimal cost(最小コスト)」が選択肢の「affordably(手頃な価格で)」に言い換えられています。
会話を聴いて、質問に答えなさい。
Question: What does the man recommend the woman do?
- Contact the project manager directly
- Submit her request in writing
- Ask her colleagues for advice
- Wait until the next board meeting
Woman: I've been having trouble getting approval for my research budget. I've sent several emails to the department head but haven't heard back.
Man: That does sound frustrating. Have you tried reaching out through the formal request system? There's usually a specific form you need to fill out.
Woman: I didn't know that. I just assumed an email would be sufficient.
Man: Unfortunately, informal communication often gets overlooked. The official written channel tends to be much more effective since it creates a paper trail.
Woman: That makes sense. I'll do that right away. Do you know where I can find the form?
Man: It should be on the intranet under the Finance section. You can get it approved within a week if you submit it properly.
正解
2. Submit her request in writing
解説:男性は "The official written channel tends to be much more effective" と言い、公式の書面による手続きを勧めています。「fill out a specific form」= 書面での申請 = 選択肢2に対応します。
ナレーションを聴いて、質問に答えなさい。
Question: What is one problem with deep-sea mining mentioned in the passage?
- It is technically impossible with current equipment.
- It may cause irreversible damage to deep-sea ecosystems.
- The minerals extracted are of insufficient quality.
- It has already been banned by international law.
Narrator: Deep-sea mining, the extraction of mineral deposits from the ocean floor, has attracted considerable interest as demand for rare metals used in batteries and electronics continues to grow. The ocean floor is rich in polymetallic nodules containing manganese, cobalt, and nickel — resources that are increasingly vital for the production of electric vehicles and renewable energy technologies.
Narrator: However, environmentalists warn that large-scale deep-sea mining could cause irreversible harm to ocean ecosystems. The deep sea harbors unique biodiversity, including species that have yet to be discovered by science. Mining operations generate sediment plumes that can spread over vast areas, smothering marine life and disrupting food chains that extend from the ocean floor to the surface.
Narrator: In response, the International Seabed Authority is working to establish regulations that balance economic interests with environmental protection. Critics argue, however, that regulatory frameworks are lagging far behind the pace of commercial interest, leaving deep-sea ecosystems inadequately protected.
正解
2. It may cause irreversible damage to deep-sea ecosystems.
解説:第2段落に "deep-sea mining could cause irreversible harm to ocean ecosystems" とあります。これを言い換えたのが選択肢2です。sediment plumes による生態系への影響が具体的な根拠として挙げられています。
会話を聴いて、質問に答えなさい。
Question: What is the woman's main point about the new urban development plan?
- It will create too many new jobs in the construction sector.
- It prioritizes economic growth while neglecting community needs.
- It should focus more on attracting foreign investment.
- It lacks sufficient funding from the central government.
Man: Have you had a chance to look at the city council's new development plan? There's a lot of excitement about the proposed commercial district expansion.
Woman: I have, and while I understand the economic rationale, I'm concerned that the plan is heavily weighted toward business interests. The communities closest to the development zone tend to have the greatest need for affordable housing and public green spaces, but those seem to have been deprioritized.
Man: I see your point. But the council argues that increased commercial activity will generate tax revenues that can be reinvested in social programs.
Woman: That's the trickle-down argument, and it doesn't always work in practice. History shows that displacement of existing residents often precedes the promised benefits. I'd feel more confident in the plan if community consultation had been more inclusive from the start.
Man: Fair enough. Do you think there's still time to advocate for changes before the final vote?
Woman: I hope so. A development plan that ignores the needs of current residents isn't genuine urban improvement — it's just commercial expansion dressed up as progress.
正解
2. It prioritizes economic growth while neglecting community needs.
解説:女性は "heavily weighted toward business interests"(ビジネス利益に偏りすぎ)と述べ、手頃な住宅や公共緑地が後回しにされていると批判しています。最後に "ignores the needs of current residents" とも言っており、選択肢2が最も適切です。
ナレーションを聴いて、質問に答えなさい。
Question: What does the passage suggest is a key reason microfinance has not always achieved its goals?
- Interest rates on microloans are too low to sustain lending institutions.
- Borrowers in rural areas lack the infrastructure to access microfinance services.
- High interest rates and debt cycles can offset the intended benefits for borrowers.
- Governments in developing nations have actively opposed microfinance programs.
Narrator: Microfinance — the provision of small loans and financial services to individuals in low-income communities — was championed in the 1990s and 2000s as a transformative tool for poverty reduction. By enabling entrepreneurs in developing countries to start or expand small businesses without access to traditional banking, microfinance promised to break cycles of poverty and empower marginalized communities, particularly women.
Narrator: However, subsequent research has raised serious questions about the real-world impact of microfinance. Studies in several countries found that while some borrowers did use loans productively, a significant proportion struggled to generate sufficient returns to repay high-interest loans, leading to debt cycles rather than economic advancement. Critics have pointed out that microfinance institutions, under pressure to remain financially viable, often charge interest rates far higher than mainstream banks, which can trap vulnerable borrowers in worsening financial situations.
Narrator: This does not mean microfinance is inherently flawed; rather, its success depends heavily on the broader economic context and the quality of financial literacy support provided to borrowers. Where microfinance is combined with business training, mentoring, and social safety nets, outcomes are considerably more positive. The lesson appears to be that financial inclusion alone is insufficient — it must be embedded within a comprehensive framework for economic development.
正解
3. High interest rates and debt cycles can offset the intended benefits for borrowers.
解説:第2段落に "high-interest loans, leading to debt cycles rather than economic advancement" および "interest rates far higher than mainstream banks, which can trap vulnerable borrowers in worsening financial situations" とあります。選択肢3はこれを正確に言い換えたものです。
会話を聴いて、質問に答えなさい。
Question: What is the man's main concern about the proposed policy?
- It will reduce the number of available jobs in the city.
- It may create unintended disadvantages for lower-income residents.
- It lacks support from the majority of local businesses.
- It conflicts with existing environmental regulations.
Woman: The city council is considering a congestion pricing scheme for the downtown area. Cars entering the central zone between 7 AM and 7 PM would be charged a daily fee. What do you think of the idea?
Man: In principle, I support reducing traffic congestion. But I'm worried about who ends up bearing the burden. Not everyone who drives into the city center does so by choice. Many workers in lower-wage jobs — think of delivery drivers, care workers, tradespeople — don't have the option to take public transport, and they can't absorb these additional costs the way higher earners can.
Woman: That's a fair point. But the revenue from the scheme could be used to improve public transport, making it a viable alternative for more people over time.
Man: Potentially, yes. But that benefit is years away. In the short term, the burden falls disproportionately on people who are already financially stretched. I'd want to see robust exemptions or rebate schemes built into the policy before I could support it fully.
正解
2. It may create unintended disadvantages for lower-income residents.
解説:男性は "lower-wage workers" や "people who are already financially stretched" に対して不均衡な負担がかかると懸念しています。"disproportionately on people who are already financially stretched" が選択肢2の根拠です。
ナレーションを聴いて、質問に答えなさい。
Question: What does the passage identify as a key limitation of universal basic income?
- It would require the complete dismantling of all existing welfare programs.
- The cost of funding it adequately may be fiscally unsustainable.
- It has failed in every country where it has been piloted.
- Most citizens oppose it due to concerns about reduced work incentives.
Narrator: Universal basic income, or UBI, is a policy proposal under which every citizen receives a regular unconditional payment from the government, regardless of employment status or income level. Advocates argue that UBI could provide a crucial safety net in an era of increasing automation, reduce bureaucratic complexity in existing welfare systems, and empower individuals to pursue education, caregiving, or entrepreneurship without the fear of destitution.
Narrator: However, UBI faces significant practical and philosophical challenges. The most immediate concern is cost: providing a meaningful income to every citizen in a large country would require enormous public expenditure. Fiscal analyses suggest that funding UBI at a level sufficient to replace basic necessities would either require substantial tax increases, a reduction in other public services, or both. Some proponents argue that UBI could replace existing welfare programs, potentially offsetting some costs, but critics warn that eliminating targeted support could leave the most vulnerable worse off.
Narrator: Despite these concerns, interest in UBI has grown considerably, particularly following the economic disruptions of the COVID-19 pandemic. Pilot programs in Finland, Kenya, and parts of the United States have produced promising results in terms of well-being and labor market participation. Whether these findings can be scaled to national level in a fiscally responsible manner remains the central unanswered question.
正解
2. The cost of funding it adequately may be fiscally unsustainable.
解説:第2段落に "providing a meaningful income to every citizen... would require enormous public expenditure" および "fiscally responsible manner remains the central unanswered question" とあります。選択肢2はこれを正確に言い換えています。選択肢1は "complete dismantling" という誇張があり不正解。